Fs global real weather v1 7273139089 simulator#
Up until recently the requirement for the simulator to accurately produce these parameters wasn't necessary however since the creation of aircraft by Level-D and more recently PMDG and a few others there has been growing band of simmers who are taking the simulator very seriously indeed especially those that fly for a virtual airline or an online service such as Vatsim.
Fs global real weather v1 7273139089 professional#
The world of the flight simmer on the other hand is a varied one but the beauty of our current simulator is that you can make your flying as realistic as you want, yes you can just fire up a Cessna, aim it wherever and take off, or, you can undergo exactly the same steps as professional pilots do, and the more you get into this side the more you require the simulator to reproduce the correct parameters so that an accurate flight can be undertaken which resembles the plan made before take-off. Which they then referred to say on a flight from London to Lagos, which back then could take a day or two! Nowadays, pilots arrive at an airport and are handed a sheaf of papers which give the synoptic situation, winds at various altitudes, temperatures, volcanic ash threats, Metars, and TAF's for your destination, alternates, enroute sigmets, turbulence areas, icing areas, all of which take some time and intelligence to digest properly. In my father's day, pilots were expected to accumulate all these various readings from along a proposed route and create their own weather map showing fronts, anticyclones etc. Taking real weather readings and transmitting them to a central bureau rather than satellites making a guess from cloud cover and temperatures and faulty computer modelling. In those days weather prediction was in many ways far more accurate than today as it was done by real people standing on the decks of weather ships, lighthouses, airports etc. As luck had it I managed to pass, and so commenced a career in flying.
Introduction I well remember when I took up flying eons ago, my instructor saying that meteorology was an inexact science, and in order to pass the exams by and large you had to put yourself in the mind-set of the examiner because the questions were so ambiguously asked that any one of 3 answers could be deemed correct.
0 kommentar(er)
